Solar Value Project
  • Home
  • SHARED SOLAR
    • Process
    • Design
    • Procurement
    • Marketing
    • Companion Measures
    • Assessment
  • SOLAR-PLUS
    • Fundamentals
    • Procurement Guidance
    • Decision Model
    • Market Growth
  • BLOG
  • About
    • The Team
    • The Project
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Archives
    • Archived Blogs
    • Archived Webinars

It's Complicated

10/24/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
by Jill Cliburn

According to the Urban Dictionary, the status “It’s Complicated” refers to an ambiguous state that is beyond acquaintance, but not quite a relationship. It also may indicate dissatisfaction with a current relationship. So when Utility Dive recently asked me why the state of community solar policy is so complicated, it’s no wonder I flashed on the need for relationship re-boot between the key parties—the utilities and the solar developers—who both should have the long-term interests of customers in mind. Granted, the Community Solar Value Project (CSVP) has sat with the utilities most often, but we know our share of developers, too. Both sides in this relationship could use to sit down and recognize each others’ strengths and weaknesses.
 
The way I put it for Utility Dive is worth repeating, “Policies that keep utilities from working effectively with developers could be a lost opportunity.” Time and again, members of the CSVP team and I have been to workshops and events where the topic will touch on community-solar policies, and the utilities are missing. Likewise, the utility folks, who just a few years ago were very excited about community solar, often see “policy” on the agenda for a community solar event, and read it as a trigger warning for an ensuing a heap of trouble.
 
The Dive article itself demonstrated how broad utility participation could make community solar better. Author Herman K. Trabish, briefly recognized that there are numerous ways to add value, before jumping on a current favorite: project siting, or “locational value.” While that’s a worthy value, let me reiterate four different areas where utility-led community solar programs add value:
  • Solar project siting and design,
  • Financing and procurement,
  • Target marketing, and
  • Co-marketing with solar-plus companion measures
 
While I read Herman's article with great interest and respect (It’s complicated!), the fledgling community solar industry would be severely short-changing itself to put too much emphasis on locational value—or on any one strategy—alone. The challenge of entering a new landscape of integrated, distributed energy resources (DERs) is that it is an ever-changing place. A suitable local solar site with high locational value is rare and likely to change within the life of the project you put there. But a combination of technical and programmatic strategies, devised by utility- and developer-based innovators working together, could bring benefits that complete a solar-portfolio triad, along with with third-party rooftop solar and centralized utility-solar resources. What would a fleet of distributed community-solar projects, incorporating diverse benefits and net high-value, look like? How could utilities work with one or more developers over time to bring this about, with a greater long-run payoff for everyone?
 
If you’re interested in this discussion, our October webinar on the Value of Going Local provides a glimpse of a new analytic strategy that takes into account a few different value-add strategies, while avoiding the traps of a conventional (utility trigger warning!) Value of Solar analysis. We also recommend that if you want to learn more about the policies that do or do-not promote community solar innovation, we’ve had a webinar on that, too, featuring NRRI’s incisive policy analyst, Tom Stanton. You can replay the webinar or download the presentations here.
 
At CSVP, we are ready to embark on our third year. We’ve accumulated lessons learned and a list of questions that need resolution in order to support a thriving community-solar movement. One thing we know for sure: We need both utilities and developers to solve problems together, and we need regulators to let them.

0 Comments

    Our Authors and Your Comments

    Jill Cliburn is President of Cliburn and Associates and principal of the solar and storage projects that inspired this site. This blog also welcomes contributors with direct experience in utility-based or scalable commercial projects in solar, storage and load flexibility. We review comments to prevent spam, so please forgive the slight delay for posting. For questions, contact us.

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015

    Categories

    All
    Case Study
    Community Solar
    Demand Response
    Demand-side Management
    Flexible Grid
    Low-income
    Policy
    Solar Plus
    Solar-plus
    Solar Value
    Storage

Copyright © 2023  Solar Value Project
Site logos and design by Jeffrey M. Kunka